Appendix C - Assessing the Quality of Intended Outcome Statements

Copyright© 2016 Stiehl & Sours. Limited rights granted to photocopy for instructor and classroom use.

Template: Scoring Guide—Assessing the Quality of Intended Outcome Statements
Rating scale: 1=absent 2=minimally met 3=adequately met 4=exceptionally met
Characteristics of Good Learning Outcome Statements
Suggestions or

Improvements
1. Action 1 2 3 4
All the statements are written in active voice, and the action words have been carefully chosen to describe the intention.




2. Context 1 2 3 4
All the statements describe what you envision students doing “after” and “outside” this academic experience—because of this experience.




3. Scope 1 2 3 4
Given the time and resources available, the outcome statements represent reasonable expectations for students.




4. Complexity 1 2 3 4
The statements, as a whole, have sufficient substance to drive decisions about what students need to learn in this experience.




5. Brevity and Clarity 1 2 3 4
The language is concise and clear, easily understood by students and stakeholders.